Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Manchester City FC v Brighton & Hove Albion FC - Exact Score
“Pick: Manchester City FC 2 - 1 Brighton & Hove Albion FC Reasoning: City have the home advantage, the better individual quality (especially Haaland), and the stronger recent form. Brighton are missing key attackers and have a long injury list. City’s control through midfield and the threat of Haaland should be enough, even if Brighton create chances (as they did in the cup). #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
Verification details
- Submission id
1565985686952445528(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1209144jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Manchester City FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC - Exact Score"; entry 11¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1209144 "Manchester City FC 2 - 1 Brighton & Hove Albion FC" outcome "Yes" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#7060), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Manchester City FC 2 - 1 Brighton & Hove Albion FC @ 11¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement