Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Rolex Paris Masters: Casper Ruud v Juan Manuel Cerundolo
“Pick: Casper Ruud -1.5 Reasoning: Ruud’s edge is the higher serve points won, higher hold %, higher return points won, higher break rate, higher total points won, higher dominance ratio, higher first-serve in, higher second-serve points won, and higher numbers in the short, middle, and long rally windows. He takes the ball early and the hold and return numbers are the ones that decide service games. Cerundolo’s edge is the 7-9 shot window and the overall H2H (clay only). The indoor hard and the overall point-winning numbers favor Ruud more than the raw H2H suggests on this surface. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
Not counted: no Jupiter trade by 15 minutes after the call
Verification details
- Submission id
1566780151145486170(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1296087jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Rolex Paris Masters: Casper Ruud vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo"; entry 49¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1296087 "Rolex Paris Masters: Casper Ruud vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Set Handicap +/-1.5" outcome "Casper Ruud" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#7173), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Casper Ruud -1.5 sets @ 49¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement