Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Sioux Falls: Liam Draxl v Daniil Ostapenkov
“Pick: Liam Draxl -1.5 Reasoning: Draxl’s edge is the higher level of recent opposition and the more consistent results in Challenger events. He takes the ball early and the first-serve numbers in stronger weeks are the ones that decide service games. Ostapenkov needs the first serve to land and the points to stay short. The ranking and recent form gaps favor Draxl. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
Verification details
- Submission id
1565462918696921261(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1270217jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Sioux Falls: Liam Draxl vs Daniil Ostapenkov"; entry 54¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1270217 "Sioux Falls: Liam Draxl vs Daniil Ostapenkov Set Handicap +/-1.5" resolved 50/50 (refund/incomplete event) uma=resolved
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6843), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Liam Draxl -1.5 sets @ 54¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement