Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Pan Pacific Open: Xinyu Wang v Alycia Parks
“Pick: Xinyu Wang Reasoning: Gemini/Grok align closely near market (63-65%) citing Wang baseline/return edge and Parks DF vulnerability on outdoor hard; ChatGPT lower (55%) from fixture/round uncertainty and low conf. Discount ChatGPT's caution as identities match and stats consistent; Parks serve upside noted but secondary. Blend weights higher-conf views for steady Wang edge in straight sets. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
Verification details
- Submission id
1564068140968149618(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1253406jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Pan Pacific Open: Xinyu Wang vs Alycia Parks"; entry 64¢ from the order-book ask at post time; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1253406 "Pan Pacific Open: Xinyu Wang vs Alycia Parks" outcome "Xinyu Wang" price 0.005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6364), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Xinyu Wang @ 64¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement