Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Lyon Open: Flavio Cobolli v Stan Wawrinka
“Tennis: Flavio Cobolli vs Stan Wawrinka (BO3) Reasoning: Gemini and Grok align closely here On Cobolli’s ranking age and athletic gear Clear edges versus Wawrinka’s limited consistency At forty-one and ranked one forty-two you see Both predicting straight sets for he ChatGPT is the outlier driven by uncertainty Of fixture and tournament clay history Versus claimed indoor rather than form free So discounted as market anchors the blend Thin Wawrinka data and missing round end Keep confidence moderate as we contend For Flavio Cobolli the pick we defend Match winner Flavio Cobolli @65c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1230527”
Verification details
- Message id
1562874852254285894open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1230527jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Lyon Open: Flavio Cobolli vs Stan Wawrinka"; entry 75¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 65¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1230527 "Lyon Open: Flavio Cobolli vs Stan Wawrinka" outcome "Flavio Cobolli" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6016), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Flavio Cobolli @ 75¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement