Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
SS Lazio v Parma Calcio 1913 - More Markets
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1169114 Pick: Over 2.5 goals @ 54¢ https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1167432 Pick: Over 1.5 goals @ 76¢ Atlético Madrid’s selection backs their attack to create and convert enough chances to reach three goals, rather than relying on a narrow win. For Lazio vs Palmeiras, the Over 1.5 selection looks for a match with enough attacking intent and scoring opportunities across both sides to produce at least two goals. #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1563627064890761238open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1168855jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "SS Lazio vs. Parma Calcio 1913 - More Markets"; boarded from the review queue by hand: two picks on two links; 'Lazio vs Palmeiras' in the read (Parma) was taken as a mis-pasted link; entry 78.9¢ from the ask printed at the post moment (78.9¢, 8s away) (caller stated 76¢); the mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post) read 78¢ while the tape was paying 78.9¢ 8s from the post; entry checked against the trade tape: the tape paid 78.9¢ 8s from the post, within a cent of the entry
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1168855 "O/U 1.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6227), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Over 1.5 @ 78.9¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement