Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Club Atlético de Madrid v RC Deportivo A Coruña - More Markets
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1169114 Pick: Over 2.5 goals @ 54¢ https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1167432 Pick: Over 1.5 goals @ 76¢ Atlético Madrid’s selection backs their attack to create and convert enough chances to reach three goals, rather than relying on a narrow win. For Lazio vs Palmeiras, the Over 1.5 selection looks for a match with enough attacking intent and scoring opportunities across both sides to produce at least two goals. #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1563627064890761238open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1169310jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Club Atlético de Madrid vs. RC Deportivo A Coruña - More Markets"; boarded from the review queue by hand: two picks on two links; 'Lazio vs Palmeiras' in the read (Parma) was taken as a mis-pasted link; entry 65.5¢ from the market price at the post moment (price-history mid 29s before the post): the caller's stated 54¢ sits below where the market was, and a stated figure may worsen an entry, never beat the tape; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1169310 "O/U 2.5" outcome "Over" price 0.0035 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6226), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Over 2.5 @ 65.5¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement