Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Santa Cruz 2: Nicolas Kicker v Facundo Mena
“Tennis: Nicolas Kicker vs Facundo Mena (BO3) Reasoning: Both models and the market odds agree on Mena's lead, Ranked near one-ninety over three-forty-five indeed. Along the South American clay his sharpness plays a role, Though Kicker's peak clay pedigree keeps prices in control. Yet Kicker lacks sustained Challenger form to run the race, So Mena claims the baseline consistency in every space. Aligning with consensus on a close and hard-fought night, We favor Mena in three sets to win the competitive fight. Match winner Facundo Mena @54c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1186624”
Verification details
- Message id
1559946709163966485open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1186624jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Santa Cruz 2: Nicolas Kicker vs Facundo Mena"; entry 58¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 54¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1186624 "Santa Cruz 2: Nicolas Kicker vs Facundo Mena" outcome "Facundo Mena" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5298), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Facundo Mena @ 58¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement