Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Jinan: Martin Landaluce v Jie Cui
“Tennis: Martin Landaluce vs Jie Cui (BO3) Reasoning: Both models strongly favor Landaluce to succeed, With serve penetration, power, and baseline pace in the lead. Against Cui's lower Challenger and ITF baseline tier, Grok admits limited deep scouting yet keeps Martin clear. Grok leans higher, while Gemini aligns with market views, Confirming Martin Landaluce is the side to choose. In Jinan, Cui has home-court familiarity in hand, Yet Landaluce's superior weapons will command. With a higher ceiling pushing him above the test, Best-of-three variance won't stop Martin from the best. Match winner Martin Landaluce @75c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1182241”
Verification details
- Message id
1559594810166480926open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1182241jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Jinan: Martin Landaluce vs Jie Cui"; entry 77¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 75¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1182241 "Jinan: Martin Landaluce vs Jie Cui" outcome "Martin Landaluce" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5213), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Martin Landaluce @ 77¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement