Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Cleveland Guardians v Tampa Bay Rays
“Cleveland Guardians vs. Tampa Bay Rays Pick: Spreads +1.5 Tampa The Rays They won 98 games against Cleveland's 85, and Rasmussen arrives dominant: 8 IP, 0.00 ERA, 0.38 WHIP, 10 K and 2 BB. They also have the advantage of the locality. The lineup (Díaz, Aranda, Caminero, Vilade, Mesa) has plenty of depth to take advantage of any stumbling of the rival pitch. The Guardians Foster Griffin (2.2 IP, 0.75 WHIP, 7 K, 0 BB) is the great unknown. With such a small sample it is difficult to evaluate it, and it probably won't get far. If they give him the ball and take him out early, the game is in the hands of Cleveland's bullpen. His lineup (Kwan, Ramírez, Bazzana, Adell) can give a timely beating, but he faces an opener in a big moment. The +143 only pays if you think Rasmussen's 8 blank entries were a short sample and not his actual level. #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1170771”
Verification details
- Message id
1559314579303964692open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1170771jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Cleveland Guardians vs. Tampa Bay Rays"; entry 74¢ from the order-book ask at post time; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1170771 "Spread -1.5" outcome "Tampa Bay Rays" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5145), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Tampa Bay Rays +1.5 @ 74¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement