Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Sharks v Bruins
“🏒 Sharks vs Bruins Pick: Boston Win San José arrives 6-4-1 with 13 points and Boston 8-2-1 with 17. The Bruins added points in seven games in a row and their last defeat in regular time was on October 5. In addition, they won 6-3 the first duel between the two, on October 13. Bruins: they play at home, where they go 4-1-0, and they have Jeremy Swayman in a great moment (6-1-1, 1.98 of average of goals against, .928 of effectiveness). David Pastrnak comes from two goals and two assists against Nashville, and Boston does not report significant injuries. Charlie McAvoy is back on defense. #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1092367”
Verification details
- Message id
1563613647761055854open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1092367jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Sharks vs. Bruins"; boarded from review queue (was: side "Boston Win" does not match event "Sharks vs. Bruins" (POLY-1092367)); the written side "Boston Win" matched no market here, so it was read from the event: only "Bruins" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry 64.5¢ from mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1092367 "Sharks vs. Bruins" outcome "Bruins" price 0.995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6214), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Bruins @ 64.5¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement