Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Maia: Joao Dinis Silva v Ivan Gakhov
“Tennis: Joao Dinis Silva vs Ivan Gakhov (BO3) Reasoning: Both analysts agree, unanimous and clear, That Ivan Gakhov holds decisive edge in here. With Challenger pedigree, experience, and baseline consistency in hand, Past nineteen-year-old local Silva, ranked outside thirteen hundred in the land. The tight market view is an illiquid book artifact, Not genuine parity reflected in the fact. Though Silva has home court familiarity on Maia indoor clay, Gakhov's heavy clay game is far too established to give way. Expect Ivan to control proceedings comfortably all through, And win in straight sets as the predictions come true. Match winner Ivan Gakhov @81c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1167511”
Verification details
- Message id
1558642716378660904open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1167511jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Maia: Joao Dinis Silva vs Ivan Gakhov"; entry 82¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 81¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1167511 "Maia: Joao Dinis Silva vs Ivan Gakhov" outcome "Ivan Gakhov" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4969), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Ivan Gakhov @ 82¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement