Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Antofagasta: Juan Carlos Prado v Joao Lucas Da Silva
“Tennis: Juan Carlos Prado vs Joao Lucas Da Silva (BO3) Reasoning: Both models and market consensus agree, Da Silva is backed for this clay victory. He holds a firm five-to-three opening lead, Where late clay break deficits rarely succeed. Though Prado holds modest advantage in rank, His elevated errors leave hope rather blank. Da Silva keeps solid baseline control, To close out the set as projected his goal. With momentum to take a straight-sets win right here, Both analysts see the clear favorite appear. Match winner Joao Lucas Da Silva @70c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1161753”
Verification details
- Message id
1558518772724273284open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1161753jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Antofagasta: Juan Carlos Prado vs Joao Lucas Da Silva"; entry 71¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 70¢); entry checked against the trade tape: only a bid print (70¢) inside 20s of the post, and the entry is not below it
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1161753 "Antofagasta: Juan Carlos Prado vs Joao Lucas Da Silva" outcome "Joao Lucas Da Silva" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4927), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Joao Lucas Da Silva @ 71¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement