Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Peyton Stearns v Han Shi
“Tennis: Peyton Stearns vs Han Shi (BO3) Reasoning: Both models strongly agree near 78-79%, citing Stearns' decisive power and tour-level pedigree over Shi's ITF-heavy profile. The market sits slightly lower at 75.5%, factoring in home-court comfort for Shi and opening-round qualifying variance. However, Stearns holds a massive class edge on fast hard courts, where her heavy forehand and first-strike tennis will overwhelm Shi's counter-punching style. The substantial ranking and firepower differential comfortably favors Stearns in straight sets. Match winner Peyton Stearns @74c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1159859”
Verification details
- Message id
1558219278312804434open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1159859jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Peyton Stearns vs Han Shi"; entry 76¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 74¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1159859 "Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Peyton Stearns vs Han Shi" outcome "Peyton Stearns" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4818), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Peyton Stearns @ 76¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement