Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Aoi Ito v Alycia Parks
“Tennis: Aoi Ito vs Alycia Parks (BO3) Reasoning: Both models favor Parks based on her superior serve power and significant ranking tier advantage on outdoor hard courts. However, Grok underestimates Ito's unorthodox, slice-heavy style, which thrives against erratic power hitters prone to unforced errors and double faults like Parks. While Parks remains the favorite due to free points on serve, Ito's counterpunching keeps the match tighter than pure baseline metrics suggest. Parks holds the higher ceiling and should navigate Ito's disruptive variety in three sets. Match winner Alycia Parks @60c #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1159864”
Verification details
- Message id
1558217199246901278open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1159864jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Aoi Ito vs Alycia Parks"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1159864 "Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Aoi Ito vs Alycia Parks" outcome "Alycia Parks" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4817), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Alycia Parks @ 60¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement