Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Shanghai Rolex Masters: Miomir Kecmanovic v Jakub Mensik
“🎾 Kecmanovic (#61) vs Mensik (#15) Pick: Mensik Win Mensik has 33-17 in the season and 24-11 in hard. Kecmanovic is 20-29 and 15-19 in hard, that is, negative balance in both. Matiz: Mensik comes from losing and Kecmanovic from winning. But with this difference in level, the quality weighs more than the streak. Mensik wins. It is the clearest gap of the day after Zverev. #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1152114”
Verification details
- Message id
1558006516060258304open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1152114jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Miomir Kecmanovic vs Jakub Mensik"; entry 75¢ from the order-book ask at post time; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1152114 "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Miomir Kecmanovic vs Jakub Mensik" outcome "Jakub Mensik" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4716), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Jakub Mensik @ 75¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement