JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 3
VERIFIED CALL
Courmayeur: Noma Noha Akugue v Alina Charaeva
Alina Charaeva
ENTRY
62.9¢
RESULT
+59%
CALLER
@gianlucabruno3
PLACED
2026-11-01 · 14:30 UTC
Nº 0007158R
WIN
+59%
469270440198
COMMUNITY.JUP.AG
WINVerifiedPredictions · Tennis · WTACall #7158 · Season 3
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Courmayeur: Noma Noha Akugue v Alina Charaeva
Said · before resolution · timestamped in Discordevent started
“Pick: Alina Charaeva Reasoning: I was waiting for an entry during the live cause pre match was not worth imo. I think it's worth now, yes she is playing against a good player with a good wins in the last matches but the level is different. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
gianlucabruno3 on community.jup.ag
Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later
Alina Charaeva @ 62.9¢
flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way
Resolved · market settlement
Won: the market resolved for Alina Charaeva.
+0.59uat a 1-unit stake (100 ÷ 62.9 − 1)
Verification details
- Submission id
1566459469270440198(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1291157jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Courmayeur: Noma Noha Akugue vs Alina Charaeva"; entry 61¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1291157 "Courmayeur: Noma Noha Akugue vs Alina Charaeva" outcome "Alina Charaeva" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#7158), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
The market
Courmayeur: Noma Noha Akugue v Alina Charaeva
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Alina Charaeva @ 62.9¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement