JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 2
VERIFIED CALL
AFC Bournemouth v Leeds United FC
AFC Bournemouth
ENTRY
47¢
RESULT
+113%
CALLER
@connection23.05.2023
PLACED
2026-10-31 · 14:09 UTC
Nº 0007100R
WIN
+113%
649548743479
COMMUNITY.JUP.AG
WINVerifiedPredictions · Football · Premier LeagueCall #7100 · Season 2
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
AFC Bournemouth v Leeds United FC
Said · before resolution · timestamped in Discordevent started
“Pick: AFC Bournemouth Reasoning: The concern for Leeds is their attacking consistency. They’ve drawn five of their opening eight league matches and recently failed to score against Sunderland. I expect Bournemouth to control more of the game, create the better chances and put Leeds under sustained pressure. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
connection23.05.2023 on community.jup.ag
Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later
AFC Bournemouth @ 47¢
flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way
Resolved · market settlement
Won: the market resolved for AFC Bournemouth.
+1.13uat a 1-unit stake (100 ÷ 47 − 1)
Verification details
- Submission id
1566091649548743479(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1209177jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "AFC Bournemouth vs. Leeds United FC"; entry 47¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1209177 "AFC Bournemouth" outcome "Yes" price 0.995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#7100), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
The market
AFC Bournemouth v Leeds United FC
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- AFC Bournemouth @ 47¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement