JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 2
VERIFIED CALL
Guangzhou Open: Lilli Tagger v Magda Linette
Under 10.5 (Set 1)
ENTRY
76¢
RESULT
+32%
CALLER
@blockbullz
PLACED
2026-10-29 · 08:52 UTC
Nº 0006713R
WIN
+32%
294207570664
COMMUNITY.JUP.AG
WINVerifiedPredictions · Tennis · WTACall #6713 · Season 2
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Guangzhou Open: Lilli Tagger v Magda Linette
Said · before resolution · timestamped in Discordevent started
“Pick: Under 10.5 sets Reasoning: The pick needs a decisive opening set, with neither player allowing it to stretch to 5–5 or a tiebreak\. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
blockbullz on community.jup.ag
Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later
Under 10.5 (Set 1) @ 76¢
flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way
Resolved · market settlement
Won: the market resolved for Under 10.5 (Set 1).
+0.32uat a 1-unit stake (100 ÷ 76 − 1)
Verification details
- Submission id
1565287294207570664(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1266760jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Guangzhou Open: Lilli Tagger vs Magda Linette"; entry 76¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1266760 "Guangzhou Open: Lilli Tagger vs Magda Linette Set 1 O/U 10.5" outcome "Under" price 0.995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6713), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
The market
Guangzhou Open: Lilli Tagger v Magda Linette
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Under 10.5 (Set 1) @ 76¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement