Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Guangzhou Open: Anna Bondar v Kaitlin Quevedo
“Pick: Kaitlin Quevedo Reasoning: Quevedo, 20 and ranked 86th, won the Sao Paulo title in September, beating Blinkova 6-4, 2-6, 6-4 and Podoroska 4-6, 6-4, 6-2, then outlasted Kenin 6-4, 6-7(5), 6-4 in 2h41 on Oct 27, saving eight of eleven break points, and is not in the doubles. Bondar, ranked 76th, beat top seed Snigur 6-4, 6-2 but lost 1-6, 3-6 to Pohankova in Wuhan and lost a 2-6, 6-7(6) doubles match on Oct 27. Bondar won their only meeting 6-1, 6-2 in 2023, so this is a close lean on recent form #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
Verification details
- Submission id
1565175727277074130(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1265182jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Guangzhou Open: Anna Bondar vs Kaitlin Quevedo"; entry 47¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1265182 "Guangzhou Open: Anna Bondar vs Kaitlin Quevedo" outcome "Kaitlin Quevedo" price 0.995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6674), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Kaitlin Quevedo @ 47¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement