Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Guangzhou Open: Claire Liu v Katerina Siniakova
“Pick: Katerina Siniakova Reasoning: Siniakova, ranked 49th against Liu at 109th, won the Osaka title last week, beating Linette 6-4, 6-1, Stoiana 6-1, 6-2, Boulter 6-1, 6-4 and Krueger 6-1, 6-0, then came back from a set down to beat Tararudee 2-6, 6-1, 6-4 in Guangzhou. Liu lost to Linette 4-6, 3-6 in Osaka and needed 2h51 and two saved match points to beat Ruzic 4-6, 7-6, 6-4. Liu leads the head to head 3-0, but those meetings were in 2022 and 2023, and Siniakova has one day of rest after six matches in nine days. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
Verification details
- Submission id
1565173766006710508(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1271222jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Guangzhou Open: Claire Liu vs Katerina Siniakova"; entry 62¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1271222 "Guangzhou Open: Claire Liu vs Katerina Siniakova" resolved 50/50 (refund/incomplete event) uma=resolved
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6673), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Katerina Siniakova @ 62¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement