JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 2
VERIFIED CALL
Guangzhou Open: Harriet Dart v Janice Tjen
Janice Tjen (Set 1)
ENTRY
53¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@wise_lynx_19745
PLACED
2026-10-28 · 09:10 UTC
Nº 0006546R
LOSS
-100%
460143418284
COMMUNITY.JUP.AG
LOSSVerifiedPredictions · Tennis · WTACall #6546 · Season 2
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Guangzhou Open: Harriet Dart v Janice Tjen
Said · before resolution · timestamped in Discordevent started
“Pick: Janice Tjen (Set 1) Reasoning: Tjen has the higher ranking and produced a very efficient first-round performance, beating Polina Kudermetova 6–2, 6–2 without facing a break point. #nfa (submitted on community.jup.ag)”
wise_lynx_19745 on community.jup.ag
Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later
Janice Tjen (Set 1) @ 53¢
flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way
Resolved · market settlement
Lost: the market resolved against this pick.
-1.00uat a 1-unit stake
Verification details
- Submission id
1564929460143418284(submitted on this site, not posted in Discord)- Market
POLY-1265188jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- submitted on community.jup.ag; event "Guangzhou Open: Harriet Dart vs Janice Tjen"; entry 53¢ from the order-book ask at submit; final at submit: the price the caller confirmed on the form
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1265188 "Guangzhou Open: Harriet Dart vs Janice Tjen Set 1 Winner" outcome "Janice Tjen" price 0.005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6546), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
The market
Guangzhou Open: Harriet Dart v Janice Tjen
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Janice Tjen (Set 1) @ 53¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement