Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Coventry City FC v Fulham FC - More Markets
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1168545 Pick: Total Goals Under 3.5 — YES @ 55¢ Reasoning: Coventry and Fulham have both had inconsistent starts to the league campaign, and this could be a competitive match with plenty at stake for both sides. Under 3.5 allows the selection to win with up to three total goals, such as 1–1, 2–1 or 1–2. However, Coventry’s recent home matches have produced goals, so the main risk is an open game that reaches four or more. #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1563545140310712390open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1168864jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Coventry City FC vs. Fulham FC - More Markets"; side names a prop, resolved on this fixture's companion event "Coventry City FC vs. Fulham FC - More Markets" (POLY-1168864) — the linked event carries only the match markets; entry 68¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 55¢); entry checked against the trade tape: only a bid print (67¢) inside 20s of the post, and the entry is not below it
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1168864 "O/U 3.5" outcome "Under" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6182), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Under 3.5 @ 68¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement