JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 2
VERIFIED CALL
RB Leipzig v SV 07 Elversberg
RB Leipzig
ENTRY
64¢
RESULT
+56%
CALLER
@connection23.05.2023
PLACED
2026-10-24 · 13:20 UTC
Nº 0006177R
WIN
+56%
614555361431
COMMUNITY.JUP.AG
WINVerifiedPredictionsCall #6177 · Season 2
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
RB Leipzig v SV 07 Elversberg
Said · before resolution · timestamped in Discordevent started
“The Red Bulls' formidable home record makes RB Leipzig to win a potential pick here. Pick: Leipzig to win @ 62c #Nfa #DYOR https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1168578”
connection23.05.2023 in #prediction-alpha-nfaOriginal message ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later
RB Leipzig @ 64¢
flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way
Entry 64¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 62¢, but that price was not there to buy.
Resolved · market settlement
Won: the market resolved for RB Leipzig.
+0.56uat a 1-unit stake (100 ÷ 64 − 1)
Verification details
- Message id
1563542614555361431open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1168578jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "RB Leipzig vs. SV 07 Elversberg"; entry 64¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 62¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1168578 "RB Leipzig" outcome "Yes" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6177), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
The market
RB Leipzig v SV 07 Elversberg
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- RB Leipzig @ 64¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement