Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Erste Bank Open, Qualification: Adolfo Vallejo v Lorenzo Sonego
“Erste Bank Open, Qualification: Adolfo Vallejo vs Lorenzo Sonego Over games 21.5 60c i really don't like the odds here and I think there's like a mistake with Vallejo as winner. I think he is the favourite one, and it's not normal seeing him at 48c to be honest. Maybe something missing in my side but it's not normal. So i choose something safer and maybe it could be a trap, i don't know. https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1243098 #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1563453751170179082open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1243098jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Erste Bank Open, Qualification: Adolfo Vallejo vs Lorenzo Sonego"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1243098 "Erste Bank Open, Qualification: Adolfo Vallejo vs Lorenzo Sonego Match O/U 21.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6130), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Over 21.5 @ 60¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement