Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
European Open: Arthur Fils v Jan-Lennard Struff
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1243111 **Why Struff can beat Fils (Brussels SF)** 1. **His serve is hot.** He won 3 matches this week without dropping a set. Against Bergs he held all 11 service games. 2. **He wins almost every first-serve point.** He won 81% of first-serve points vs Bergs, and hit 13–15 aces in earlier matches. 3. **Fils has a weak spot.** He won only 35% of his second-serve points in his last match. Struff can attack it. 4. **Fast indoor court.** It helps a big server. Tiebreaks are likely, and in tiebreaks either player can win. 5. **He has beaten top players.** This season he beat Medvedev and Hurkacz at Wimbledon.Struff 19C #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1563449201470480476open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1243111jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "European Open: Arthur Fils vs Jan-Lennard Struff"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1243111 "European Open: Arthur Fils vs Jan-Lennard Struff" outcome "Jan-Lennard Struff" price 0.995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6125), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Jan-Lennard Struff @ 19¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement