Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Ipswich Town FC v Nottingham Forest FC - More Markets
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1162669 Pick: Both Teams to Score YES @ 61¢ Ipswich have struggled to keep clean sheets, while Forest have shown they can contribute goals away from home. Ipswich also scored twice against Manchester City in their previous league match, despite losing 3–2. Both sides have attacking potential, making BTTS YES a reasonable selection, although Forest’s recent scoring struggles remain a risk. #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1563232613756440626open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1162934jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Ipswich Town FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC - More Markets"; side names a prop, resolved on this fixture's companion event "Ipswich Town FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC - More Markets" (POLY-1162934) — the linked event carries only the match markets; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1162934 "Both Teams to Score" outcome "Yes" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6084), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- both teams to score YES @ 61¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement