Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Celtic FC v RC Celta de Vigo - More Markets
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1160470 Pick: Over 1.5 Goals @ 81¢ https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1155426 Both Teams to Score YES @ 68¢ https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1155422 Pick: Over 1.5 Goals @ 72¢ https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1155406 Pick: Over 1.5 Goals @ 81¢ There’s a reasonable goals based case across these four fixtures. Celtic vs Celta Vigo has an estimated 78% chance of clearing Over 1.5 goals, while Ajax vs Atalanta has a roughly 62% model estimate for both teams to score. Sporting Braga vs Gent and Monaco vs Freiburg also have Over 1.5 goal estimates around 77% and 80%, respectively. These are model estimates, not guarantees, and adding more legs makes the overall combo harder to land. #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1562901154147602482open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1160554jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Celtic FC vs. RC Celta de Vigo - More Markets"; side names a prop, resolved on this fixture's companion event "Celtic FC vs. RC Celta de Vigo - More Markets" (POLY-1160554) — the linked event carries only the match markets; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1160554 "O/U 1.5" outcome "Over" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#6032), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Over 1.5 @ 81¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement