Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Almaty Open: Terence Atmane v Mattia Bellucci
“Almaty Open: Terence Atmane vs Mattia Bellucci Bellucci W 52c To be honest I think the odds are little bit wrong here, and I explain why. Atmane before the last match (won against Hijikata) is retired two times (against Ymer and Tomic), of course he had some problems and before that he wasnt consistent. And you know I like Bellucci so much, he is a really good player and in the last months he showed maybe his best. He won also an amazing Challenger (and hard) in China. https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1229025 #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1562702506780393624open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1229025jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Almaty Open: Terence Atmane vs Mattia Bellucci"; entry 53¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 52¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- closed early via #close (msg 1562731523529113731, posted 2026-10-22T07:37:09.357Z): entry 53c -> exit 78c (+25.0c realized); trade tape at the close: taker bought the other outcome at 22c, which is this one sold at 78c, 85s from the post; "#close Bellucci"
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5950), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Mattia Bellucci @ 53¢
- Resolution
- caller’s sale (closed early)