Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
European Open: Martin Damm v Francisco Cerundolo
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1218741 **Why Francisco Cerundolo should beat Martin Damm Jr. in Brussels** Cerundolo is a steady top-25 player who wins week after week. Damm is a young American who is still trying to break into the top 100. On paper this is a clear gap in level. - Cerundolo is ranked No. 21 in the world. Damm is No. 107. - Cerundolo has won 36 matches this year and lost 20. - Damm has lost 6 of his last 10 matches. - Cerundolo has a strong forehand and hits heavy from the baseline. He can control long rallies against a less experienced player. Damm has a big serve, so expect some close service games. But over a full match, Cerundolo's experience and consistency should carry him through.Francisco Cerundolo 63C #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1562241542687690804open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1218741jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "European Open: Martin Damm vs Francisco Cerundolo"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1218741 "European Open: Martin Damm vs Francisco Cerundolo" outcome "Francisco Cerundolo" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5829), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Francisco Cerundolo @ 63¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement