Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Wolverhampton Wanderers FC v Portsmouth FC

Said · before resolutionOct 20, 15:39 UTC · timestamped in Discordevent started Oct 20, 18:45 UTC

“Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Portsmouth FC https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-919181 Pick Wolverhampton at 60c Wolverhampton altered their tactical approach, which proved quite successful in boosting their goal output; the team relies on a combination of talented young players and experienced forwards. #nfa”

Ffukangan in #prediction-alpha-nfaOriginal message ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later

Wolverhampton Wanderers FC @ 63¢

flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way

Entry 63¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 60¢, but that price was not there to buy.

ResolvedOct 20, 20:48 UTC · market settlement

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

-1.00uat a 1-unit stake

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5793), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.