Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Tottenham Hotspur FC v Coventry City FC
“Tottenham Hotspur FC vs. Coventry City FC Odds: ML Tottenham Hotspur FC "NO @ 37c" Coventry City is on a hot streak, coming off a massive 4-1 win over Newcastle. Meanwhile, Tottenham is a mess right now. They have only scored 3 goals in 83 shots from their 6 games this season (terrible). My prediction is ML Tottenham Hotspur FC "NO" https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1140915 #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1561778924357161071open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1140915jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Tottenham Hotspur FC vs. Coventry City FC"; boarded from the review queue by hand: 'ML Tottenham Hotspur FC "NO @ 37c"': the quoted NO came apart from the name, so the bot would have recorded Tottenham YES and held it instead (fixture-pick guard); entry is the caller's stated 37¢; the order book at the post moment reads 36.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 36.5¢, is within tolerance of the claim); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1140915 "Tottenham Hotspur FC" outcome "No" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5722), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Caller’s price
- Tottenham Hotspur FC No @ 37¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement