Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Counter-Strike: Team Falcons v BetBoom Team (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Playoffs
“Esport CS2 Stage: Thunderpick world championship BO3 Confidence: 🟠 mid risk (75%) reasoning: BetBoom beat Falcons 2–0 at the IEM Cologne Major in June, winning Ancient 13–10 and Nuke, Falcons need to correct the mistakes that cost them those maps, particularly in close rounds. Better utility, cleaner trading and more disciplined late-round decisions could make the difference this time. Forecast: falcons map2 35c, https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1201748 #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1561086217666297949open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Adjacent msgs
1561085674491351090(#nfa tag / market link)- Market
POLY-1201748jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Counter-Strike: Team Falcons vs BetBoom Team (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Playoffs"; entry 52¢ from the market price at the post moment (price-history mid 55s before the post): the caller's stated 35¢ sits below where the market was, and a stated figure may worsen an entry, never beat the tape; entry checked against the trade tape: entry 52¢ -> 35.4¢, the tape paid 35.4¢ at the post moment (caller stated 35¢) (1s after the post)
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1201748 "Map 2 Winner" outcome "Team Falcons" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5575), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Team Falcons (Map 2) @ 35.4¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement