Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Counter-Strike: MIBR v 100 Thieves (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Playoffs
“Counter-Strike: MIBR vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Playoffs both teams are on 3 winning streaks, but MIBR has tougher opponents than 100 thieves.statistically, MIBR are in better position. first map is Nuke. 100 thieves has better WR than MIBR. but, not huge difference in WR tho . i am leaning in MIBR picking game 1 winner - MIBR 66C #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1201613”
Verification details
- Message id
1560976319833968692open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1201613jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Counter-Strike: MIBR vs 100 Thieves (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Playoffs"; entry is the caller's stated 66¢; the order book at the post moment reads 55¢ (mid at post time (the book moved 10.0¢ between the post and capture, so the live ask is not the ask you saw)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 64.5¢, is within tolerance of the claim); entry checked against the trade tape: the tape paid 66¢ 18s from the post, within a cent of the entry
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1201613 "Map 1 Winner" outcome "MIBR" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5526), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Caller’s price
- MIBR (Map 1) @ 66¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement