Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Counter-Strike: Astralis v MIBR (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Playoffs
“Counter-Strike: Astralis vs MIBR *(Stake Pulse Beat III Playoffs)* https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1196576 Honestly, find it strange that Astralis are the favorites here. They just changed two players, didn’t play any real opposition since then and I am not too fond of new additions (cmtry used to awp, now he is a rifler; Siuhy had an unwanted break and is an igl) - not too easy to implement new players fast enough, more so when one of them is the main caller. MIBR didn’t show the best form in today’s games but I still view them as a fairly good team that should be likely to win against a team with 2 new questionable additions. __Picking MIBR here 44c __ #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1560424192719986779open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1196576jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Counter-Strike: Astralis vs MIBR (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Playoffs"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- closed early via #close (msg 1560670298968162445, posted 2026-10-16T15:06:35.126Z): entry 44c -> exit 29c (-15.0c realized); CLOB history 0.295 at 2026-10-16T15:06:17.000Z (18s from post); "#close" | RE-PRICED from the trade tape once it indexed: exit 29.5c -> 29c (taker bought the other outcome at 71c, which is this one sold at 29c, 1s from the post)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5420), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- MIBR @ 44¢
- Resolution
- caller’s sale (closed early)