Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
LoL: Cloud9 v Karmine Corp (BO5) - Worlds Play-In
“Esport LOL Stage: worlds BO5 Confidence: 🟠 mid risk (75%) reasoning: KC's recent form listing shows eight wins in their last ten series, which is encouraging, although that record alone doesn't establish how they'll perform against Cloud9 today. is a double-elimination Play-In bracket, so a loss today would not automatically eliminate KC. It would send them down the lower bracket, where they would have less room Forecast: KC game3 39c, https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1167259 #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1560390582394691746open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1167259jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "LoL: Cloud9 vs Karmine Corp (BO5) - Worlds Play-In"; entry 54¢ from the market price at the post moment (price-history mid 40s before the post): the caller's stated 39¢ sits below where the market was, and a stated figure may worsen an entry, never beat the tape; entry checked against the trade tape: entry 54¢ -> 39¢, the tape paid 39¢ at the post moment (caller stated 39¢) (3s before the post)
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1167259 "Game 3 Winner" outcome "Karmine Corp" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5417), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Karmine Corp (Game 3) @ 39¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement