Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Counter-Strike: PARIVISION v BetBoom Team (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group B
“Counter-Strike: PARIVISION vs BetBoom Team *(Thunderpick World Championship Group B) * https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1190711 Pretty much a 50/50 game, but I pick youth here. I like more pro-active style of BB; hope that zorte wakes up today. Sentiment re Pari is the same - too many old players that I am not too fond of, Jame is washed as an awper. __Picking BetBoom Team 48c __ #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1560295418825277583open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1190711jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Counter-Strike: PARIVISION vs BetBoom Team (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group B"; boarded from review queue (was: side "youth here" does not match event "Counter-Strike: PARIVISION vs BetBoom Team (BO3) - Thunderpick World Championship Group B" (POLY-1190711)); the written side "youth here" matched no market here, so it was read from the event: only "BetBoom Team" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry checked against the trade tape: only a bid print (47¢) inside 20s of the post, and the entry is not below it
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1190711 "Match Winner" outcome "BetBoom Team" price 0.9785 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5390), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- BetBoom Team @ 48¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement