Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Wuhan Tennis Open: Iva Jovic v Maja Chwalinska
“Wuhan Tennis Open: Iva Jovic vs Maja Chwalinska Chwalinska +1,5 handicap set 49c I don't agree with the odds here too, I don't understand why we have the polish at 27c as winner of the match. Ok Jovic is in her prime (she is only 18 years old) and now in her best WTA ranking but I have to say not in her best conditions. Yes she arrived here with a good win in WTA 500 in Mexico but never played against higher level players. #NFA https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1187589”
Verification details
- Message id
1560165892686614538open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Adjacent msgs
1560164938167881758(#nfa tag / market link)- Market
POLY-1187589jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Wuhan Tennis Open: Iva Jovic vs Maja Chwalinska"; entry 50¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 49¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1187589 "Wuhan Tennis Open: Iva Jovic vs Maja Chwalinska Set Handicap +/-1.5" outcome "Maja Chwalinska" price 0.9955 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5335), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Maja Chwalinska +1.5 sets @ 50¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement