Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Counter-Strike: MIBR v BC.Game Esports (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Group D
“Counter-Strike: MIBR vs BC.Game Esports *(Stake Pulse Beat III Group D)* https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1140038 Imho Bc is not a good team despite the roster. S1mple is no longer the player he used to be; Asap lacks experience and this will become evident soon enough. MIBR to my mind is a t1.5 team that has been battle tested and had enough time to relax and prepare for the tournament, especially for their opening match. __TLDR:__ BC is an overhyped team, expect domination from MIBR __Picking MIBR 56C__ #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1559985619206275214open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1140038jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Counter-Strike: MIBR vs BC.Game Esports (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat III Group D"; side inferred from the linked event: only "MIBR" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry 56¢ from the order-book ask at post time; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1140038 "Match Winner" outcome "MIBR" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5314), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- MIBR @ 56¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement