Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Wolverhampton Wanderers FC v Bolton Wanderers FC

Said · before resolutionOct 13, 14:36 UTC · timestamped in Discordevent started Oct 13, 18:45 UTC

“Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Bolton Wanderers FC Pick: Wolverhampton @ 70¢ https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1106703 Wolverhampton has been performing impressively in the English League Two; this matchup should lead to a much more open style of play, and as the home team, they ought to be capable of putting on a performance that delights their fans. #NFA”

Ccrypto_strategy in #prediction-alpha-nfaOriginal message ↗ (opens in a new tab)

Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later

Wolverhampton Wanderers FC @ 71¢

flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way

Entry 71¢: the price the Buy button actually charged the moment the call was posted. The caller wrote 70¢, but that price was not there to buy.

ResolvedOct 13, 20:40 UTC · market settlement

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

-1.00uat a 1-unit stake

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5210), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.