Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Shanghai Rolex Masters: Alexander Zverev v Alexander Bublik
“Shanghai ATP1000 Stage: R16 Confidence: 🟠 low risk (58%) Forecast: zverev 45c Reasoning: Zverev defeated Wu Yibing 6–4, 7–6(4) before beating Quentin Halys 6–4, 6–7(8), 6–3 to reach the fourth round. He has demonstrated that he can close out difficult matches even when an opponent pushes him into a deciding set. Mfer is good with them asce(s) https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1175342 #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1559538729020821534open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1175342jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Alexander Zverev vs Alexander Bublik"; entry is the caller's stated 45¢; the order book at the post moment reads 47.5¢ (mid at post time (the book moved 14.0¢ between the post and capture, so the live ask is not the ask you saw)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 47.5¢, is within tolerance of the claim); entry checked against the trade tape: the tape paid 41¢ 3s from the post, within a cent of the entry
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1175342 "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Alexander Zverev vs Alexander Bublik" outcome "Alexander Zverev" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5194), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Caller’s price
- Alexander Zverev @ 45¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement