Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Shanghai Rolex Masters: Arthur Gea v Jakub Mensik
“Tennis: Arthur Gea vs Jakub Mensik (BO3) – Shanghai Rolex Masters R16 I'm picking Jakub Mensik at 60¢. Gea is coming off a huge upset over Ben Shelton, winning both sets in tiebreaks. He's clearly in excellent form, so this won't be an easy match for Mensik. However, I lean toward Mensik because of his higher ranking, greater experience against elite ATP competition, and stronger serving game. He's also coming off a solid three-set win over Francisco Cerundolo. His serve should be a major advantage on Shanghai's outdoor hard courts. Gea's momentum makes this a competitive matchup, but I trust Mensik's power and experience to get the job done. #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1175341”
Verification details
- Message id
1559314679866597547open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1175341jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Arthur Gea vs Jakub Mensik"; entry 61¢ from the order-book ask at post time (caller stated 60¢); entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1175341 "Shanghai Rolex Masters: Arthur Gea vs Jakub Mensik" outcome "Jakub Mensik" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5146), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Jakub Mensik @ 61¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement