Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Dota 2: Nemiga Gaming v 111 (BO3) - DreamLeague Eastern Europe Open Qualifier 2 Playoffs
“Dota 2: Nemiga Gaming vs 111 (BO3) - DreamLeague Eastern Europe Open Qualifier 2 Playoffs Nemiga has had poor performances in recent matches. Three out of five players are newbies, and they also have one stand-in. Their records are neither impressive nor promising. 111 has three players from MOUZ, so overall, 111 looks to be in better shape here. Picking 111 71C #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1174047”
Verification details
- Message id
1559188992040239325open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1174047jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Dota 2: Nemiga Gaming vs 111 (BO3) - DreamLeague Eastern Europe Open Qualifier 2 Playoffs"; entry is the caller's stated 71¢; the order book at the post moment reads 69¢ (price-history mid at post time (the book read 76¢ against a flat 69¢ tape and was not credible)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 69.0¢, is within tolerance of the claim); the order book read 76¢ at boarding, which the market's own record does not support (the tape sat flat on 69¢ across the post), so the tape is the price; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1174047 "Match Winner" outcome "111" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5113), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Caller’s price
- 111 @ 71¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement