Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
LoL: BNK FEARX v JD Gaming (BO5) - Demacia Cup Global Invitational Playoffs
“https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1153957 Picking BNK FEARX at 68c Picking BNK FEARX -1.5 at 49c I don't really understand these odds, I found JDG super sus since the start of this Demacia CUP, they are super inconsistent, didn't impress me at all, especially since they changed their midlaner and their jungler, they should've even lost to fucking NAVI (???????), meanwhile FEARX so far didn't lose a single game. My confidence : FearX 8.5/10 - FearX -1.5 6.5/10 #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1558896684472344626open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1153957jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "LoL: BNK FEARX vs JD Gaming (BO5) - Demacia Cup Global Invitational Playoffs"; second pick in the same message: "BNK FEARX -1.5"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1153957 "Game Handicap: BFX (-1.5) vs JD Gaming (+1.5)" outcome "BNK FEARX" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5054), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- BNK FEARX -1.5 games @ 49¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement