Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Dota 2: Team Yandex v Team Spirit (BO5) - BLAST Slam Playoffs
“Dota 2: Team Yandex vs Team Spirit (BO5) - BLAST Slam Playoffs I think Yandex has the better draft here. Timber might be difficult to kill and is also a strong counter to NP. However, we’ve seen that whenever YS picks Bane, it’s usually a clear W for them. Jk😗 TS need more scaling and better rotations to deal with Timber and bring him down. I am more comfortable with Yandex pick here . Risk - high Picking Yandex as Game 2 winner 55C #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1170805”
Verification details
- Message id
1558870025199161494open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1170805jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Dota 2: Team Yandex vs Team Spirit (BO5) - BLAST Slam Playoffs"; entry 64.5¢ from the market price at the post moment (price-history mid 36s before the post): the caller's stated 55¢ sits below where the market was, and a stated figure may worsen an entry, never beat the tape; entry checked against the trade tape: entry 64.5¢ -> 76¢, the tape paid 76¢ at the post moment (caller stated 55¢) (2s before the post)
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1170805 "Game 2 Winner" outcome "Team Yandex" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#5036), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Team Yandex (Game 2) @ 76¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement