Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Counter-Strike: Bounty Hunters Esports v largadosypelados (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #3 Playoffs
“Counter-Strike: Bounty Hunters Esports vs largadosypelados (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #3 Playoffs https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1156597 Bounty Hunters Esports to win at 51c Bounty Hunters have won their last two series 2–0, beating ALKA and Procyon, and have the stronger current ranking on HLTV (#74 vs #113). Their lineup has solid firepower through ponter, pepe and zock, Bounty Hunters have added urban0 so it’s not the same exact lineup as the previous meeting (because as close as it was they lost their last head to head) however with that said their current streak looks better and clean, whereas Largadosypelados: W–L–W–L–L not as accurate #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1558531071480692947open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1156597jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Counter-Strike: Bounty Hunters Esports vs largadosypelados (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #3 Playoffs"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1156597 "Match Winner" outcome "Bounty Hunters Esports" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4934), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Bounty Hunters Esports @ 51¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement