Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Dota 2: PARIVISION v Aurora (BO3) - BLAST Slam Playoffs
“Esport dota2 Stage: Blast slam iii BO3 Confidence: 🟠 mid risk (75%) reasoning: If PARIVISION draft an aggressive lineup, Aurora can defend towers, avoid unnecessary engagements and wait for their cores to reach key item timings. A controlled mid-to-late game could give Aurora opportunities to turn the match around. Forecast: aurora game2 22c, https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1161335 #nfa”
Verification details
- Message id
1558509727313436742open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1161335jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Dota 2: PARIVISION vs Aurora (BO3) - BLAST Slam Playoffs"; entry is the caller's stated 22¢; the order book at the post moment reads 22.2¢ (mid at post time (the book was moving 7.1¢ a minute and we read it 22s after the post, so the live ask is our lag and not your price)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands (the price-history mid at the post moment, 21.5¢, is within tolerance of the claim); entry checked against the trade tape: entry 22¢ -> 23¢, the tape paid 23¢ at the post moment (caller stated 22¢) (1s before the post)
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1161335 "Game 2 Winner" outcome "Aurora" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4922), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Aurora (Game 2) @ 23¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement