JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 2
VERIFIED CALL
SC Braga v Sporting CP
SC Braga No
ENTRY
70¢
RESULT
+43%
CALLER
@connection23.05.2023
PLACED
2026-10-09 · 19:12 UTC
Nº 0004809R
WIN
+43%
429923889162
COMMUNITY.JUP.AG
WINVerifiedPredictionsCall #4809 · Season 2
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
SC Braga v Sporting CP
Said · before resolution · timestamped in Discordevent started
“Sporting CP have the stronger attacking profile and a better league position, but Braga’s home advantage makes an outright away win a riskier selection. I expect a competitive match, with Sporting CP having enough quality to avoid defeat and potentially take all three points. Pick: SC Braga Win NO @70c #NFA #DYOR https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1086519”
connection23.05.2023 in #prediction-alpha-nfaOriginal message ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Enteredthe ask at that moment, not a price typed later
SC Braga No @ 70¢
flat 1-unit stake: every call on the board is scored the same way
Resolved · market settlement
Won: the market resolved for SC Braga No.
+0.43uat a 1-unit stake (100 ÷ 70 − 1)
Verification details
- Message id
1558195429923889162open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1086519jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "SC Braga vs. Sporting CP"; entry checked against the trade tape: the tape paid 70¢ 19s from the post, within a cent of the entry
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1086519 "SC Braga" outcome "No" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4809), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
The market
SC Braga v Sporting CP
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- SC Braga No @ 70¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement