Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Valorant: 100 Thieves v Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs
“**VALORANT Champions** Phase: Playoffs Risk: 🟡 Medium Risk Pick: **100 Thieves to win vs Nongshim RedForce** Reason: I think 100 Thieves will show a much better level today. They were on a great winning streak, beating top teams like LOUD, Leviatan and NRG before losing to G2. They basically threw the first map, and the second was really close. Asuna and Timotino were literally flying on the second map, looking absolutely insane. I expect them to have reviewed their mistakes with their coach and fixed them by now. Plus, this is an elimination match, so if they lose, theyre out of Champions. They also beat Nongshim 2-1 at the Esports World Cup not too long ago. After beating teams of that caliber, I really dont see them losing to Nongshim. #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1153924”
Verification details
- Message id
1558071516841779360open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1153924jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Valorant: 100 Thieves vs Nongshim RedForce (BO3) - VCT Champions Playoffs"; entry 64¢ from the order-book ask at post time; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1153924 "Match Winner" outcome "100 Thieves" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4747), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- Traded on Jupiter
- Starts
- Ask at post
- 100 Thieves @ 64¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement