Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
China Open: Elise Mertens v Iga Swiatek
“China Open: Elise Mertens vs Iga Swiatek Swiatek W 79c I find value also in 79c to be honest, Mertens had a good run but analyzing the context: 1) first match against Volynets and we don't have to add any words, 2) Ostapenko is an ex player of course (check the highlught only and you can understand) 3) Coco Gauff, we can open a book here for this winning by the belgium but i don't do. Coco was completely out of the match mentally for racism things happened in the previous match. Now, Iga is on fire. She needs to find the best energies to get this tournament and she can win easily to be honest. The possible opponent could be Zheng. So let's see. https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-1147698 #NFA”
Verification details
- Message id
1558049123020836864open in Discord ↗ (opens in a new tab) (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-1147698jup.ag ↗ (opens in a new tab)- Capture note
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "China Open: Elise Mertens vs Iga Swiatek"; entry checked against the trade tape: nothing traded inside 20s of the post
- Graded via
- gamma POLY-1147698 "China Open: Elise Mertens vs Iga Swiatek" outcome "Iga Swiatek" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa (opens in a new tab) and tag AG with this call id (#4739), within 48 hours of grading. Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.
- Venue
- Jupiter Prediction Markets
- Jupiter trade
- No Jupiter trade found in linked wallets
- Starts
- Ask at post
- Iga Swiatek @ 79¢
- Resolution
- market’s official settlement